<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

  <channel>
    <title>Vorg pointless RSS feed</title>
    <description>pointless tag at the Vorg blog</description>
    <link>http://vorg.ca/tag/pointless</link>
	<copyright>All items Copyright 2001-2004 by their respective authors</copyright>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:info&#64;vorg&#46;com"/>
    <atom:link href="http://vorg.ca/tag/pointless/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

<item>
      <title>This post is not available in your region</title>
      <link>http://vorg.ca/3088-This-post-is-not-available-in-your-region</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ Anyone else sick of not being able to see a bunch of things on the internet because their IP number isn't registered in the U.S.?  How does this make business sense for anyone?  Who benefits from me not being able to watch a few short TV clips because I am in Europe?  Aren't TV networks shooting themselves in the foot by blocking a potential global market?  Someone please explain (not the copyright laws, I know those; explain the business rationale.)]]></description>
      <guid>http://vorg.ca/3088-This-post-is-not-available-in-your-region</guid>
      <dc:creator>dye!</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>unnecessary pointless restrictions</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-13T19:29:24-04:00</dc:date>
	  <comments>http://vorg.ca/3088-This-post-is-not-available-in-your-region#replies</comments>
</item>
<item>
      <title>Yawn... election predictions... snore...</title>
      <link>http://vorg.ca/2959-Yawn...-election-predictions...-snore...</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ I predict exactly the same result as in 2006, except with one less Conservative and one more independent (ie., 2). ]]></description>
      <guid>http://vorg.ca/2959-Yawn...-election-predictions...-snore...</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrisdye</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Canadian election pointless waste time money</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-10-13T19:50:41-04:00</dc:date>
	  <comments>http://vorg.ca/2959-Yawn...-election-predictions...-snore...#replies</comments>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
