<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

  <channel>
    <title>Vorg ethics RSS feed</title>
    <description>ethics tag at the Vorg blog</description>
    <link>http://vorg.ca/tag/ethics</link>
	<copyright>All items Copyright 2001-2004 by their respective authors</copyright>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:info&#64;vorg&#46;com"/>
    <atom:link href="http://vorg.ca/tag/ethics/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

<item>
      <title>Brain Enhancement</title>
      <link>http://vorg.ca/2728-Brain-Enhancement</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/weekinreview/09carey.html?_r=1&ex=1362718800&en=753abf3a269f71c3&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin">The Ethics of Brain Enhancement</a> from the New York Times strikes home in a distinct "the future is now" sci-fi sense.<blockquote>"The main purpose is to try to learn things, to get experience, to write papers, to do experiments. So in that case if you can do it better because you've got some drug on board, that would on the face of things seem like a plus."</blockquote>Comes via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/03/09/debate-around-brain.html">BoingBoing article with more links</a>.]]></description>
      <guid>http://vorg.ca/2728-Brain-Enhancement</guid>
      <dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>drugs health ethics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T02:23:54-04:00</dc:date>
	  <comments>http://vorg.ca/2728-Brain-Enhancement#replies</comments>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
